Korg Forums

yup, i won´t pretend that i fully understand karma- only tried a few presets and and listened to a few karma demos i dont want a "ready machine", i just think most karma created stuff i heard before sounds pretty arpeggiated and i think it is much easier for me if i simply record my music the way i ...

karma CAN be powerful, but from my limited use of it i also think the results are too arpeggiatesque for my needs and if i was using it, it would be more for program changes, wave sequencing or midi control change modulations and nothing note pattern related if i want to approach things differently ...

of course switching equipment on and off costs a little of its lifetime, but as long as you dont do it constantly like a few times per minute, it is still way better than keeping stuff on nonstop for months. plus the switching mainly stresses the psu only and does not unnecessarily wear the other ...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LBduNcf1 ... re=related

as i think the ability to transpose user created patterns on the fly is way more "professional" than "simple" arpeggiated stuff Then you think wrong, you maybe missunderstood the Termins of KARMA and ARRANGER where Arranger is nothing compared to a KARMA engine which you call Simple Arpegiated ...

voted for no, as long as you won´t be able to utilize / customize all of it´s functions on the machine itself but my real hope for the next generation is that korg will revise their workstation paradigm and add arranger keyboard capabilities to it, as i think the ability to transpose user created p ...

even though i am not that much into arpeggiators (and also not into karma), i agree with you- it seems like a step back in this regard from the triton and even from "toys" like the microx (though really not trying to bash this cool little synth) i would not put your hopes up too high though, since i ...

try and see for yourself? even if someone told you that it is 58.6% better, it doesnt mean it is better to you (just look at the DAW wars where everyone claims his sequencer is by far the best) i personally have not used a Triton or Trinity (only hardware sequencer besides my M3 i know is the QY-70 ...

so yes, this is why i don't like it, if you like church music, bad rap, bad r and b, elevator music, yes its a fantastic synth if you want it to sound clean, steril, static and boring elevator music could also be made with an e-guitar or oldschool sampler: clean static boring or cheesiness depends ...

if you say so mr narrow mind

I love the trinity so much, i think no other work station comes close, the trinity with the prophecy board or moss is simply the best work station ever made. I really wish i had the full keyboard again. and so say people about their beloved fantom / motif / kurzweil / jd990... who is right here ...

not sure if i understand you correctly, but drag & drop is working in the piano roll view. in the track view ít is not exactly drag & drop, but you can highlight one measure (or as many as you want) and click it/them to their new destination. as long as you dont unhighlight it/them, you can continue ...

hi, maybe i am just too stupid, but i can´t figure out myself how to record the step sequencer MIDI output when it is triggered by a DAW. so far i am only able to do so if i manually trigger it on my radias when it is set to "postkb" in it´s global settings, but it doesn´t seem to work when i´m try ...

+ the M3 OS is pretty mature by now and already had a big overhaul. of course some minor glitches could be addressed or some features added, but steady software update support is not a common thing in the hardware business and to be honest the only company i can think of at the moment who do this is ...