No wiggle room here. This is your OP. Why would it be ‘nice’ for someone to resample Ivory if the only person that could use it would be the person who resampled it? This is without doubt a thinly veiled attempt to elicit piracy, pure and simple.korg1 wrote:it would be nice if :
1) Someone could resample Ivory II American Concert D (24layers)
2) korg update pa4x's Os
There is a vast difference between sampling a hardware synth and a sampled library that someone made. Likewise there’s a vast difference between sampling a legacy synth (and just a few of its possible sounds, at that), and wholesale copying of a current workstation or arranger’s ROM. Like I said go resample a Genos and see how legal Yamaha think that is!
Ivory II is a $299 product. The version for Motif cost $99 ...
But I guess it might be ‘nice’ if we didn’t have to pay Synthogy, right?

By the way, I also have been a professional keyboard player, pianist, session musician and studio engineer for nearly 50 years. You know what would be ‘epic’? If those with apparently no agenda other than to stir the pot would quit chiming in... Either you have an opinion on the subject, which does affect all of us (how legal is it to rip off existing commercial products?) or you are here to eat popcorn.
Again I say, someone that is trying to sell software that is EASILY copied and given away should really think twice about encouraging others to do the same. That is all. The simple answer is no, if you wouldn’t want someone to do it to you, you shouldn’t want it done to someone else. It’s called ‘ethics’, kids, and is part of being a professional. Or so it ought, I guess.