the m3 is the EXACT reason this is an incorrect statement. A kronos version of the m3 module would be a perfectly awesome and VERY welcomed addition to the Kronos family. I'd probably get one. ... and probably even get rid of my 88 in the process.jimknopf wrote:From my view a rack version of the Kronos wouldn't make much sense, besides providing a backup, which is the best pro argument. But the weight and price of a Kronos 61 wouldn't make such a big difference for serving as backup for pro bands, and it would be much better suited for that purpose, because else you would need an additional master keyboard PLUS a lot of tricky controller routing to get the same result.
The whole Kronos surface is built around the OS in a way no rack provides. And instead of buying a Kronos rack in addition to any number of outdated keyboards, it makes MUCH more sense to buy a Kronos with the proper controller field and kick off some of the then redundant or obsolete stuff.
At the moment, the Kronos is the one synth that is the most powerful by far, in any keyboard setup, and it should be the natural gear center piece. No rack needed for that, So I think this thread proves nothing, besides wishful thinking of some who would love to get all the Kronos sound possibilities at a price point several hundred $ below the 61. I understand this wish, but still think it doesn't make too much sense with something like the Kronos, which is no simple preset device, but a full blown multi-engine synth.
this is why in my opinion the m3 is dang near the single handed most versatile flagship workstation EVER. That ALL INCLUSIVE module was a VERY amazing idea/concept. And I only wonder why no one else has thought of it before or even continued down that road.
The m3.... it really is THE TRUTH.... a Kronos version... well I don't even have a name for how awesome that would be.
People thought a Motif XF rack (2gb or FlashRam) would be and end all machine... no a Kronos (m3 like) module would be an END ALL!!!!
Enuf Said.