Open Architecture Synthesis Studio

ytl · Post by **ytl** » Wed Apr 27, 2011 1:10 pm

Dear KORG,
Open Architecture Synthesis Studio
How can Oasys or Kronos to used (Bristol Synthesiser Emulations on Linux)

MartinHines · Post by **MartinHines** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 1:58 am

What is your question?

ytl · Post by **ytl** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:16 am

Hi MartinHines
My question is
Oasys is Open Architecture Synthesis Studio
Can I Install (Bristol Synthesiser Emulations on Linux) to oasys

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:17 pm

ytl wrote:Hi MartinHines
My question is
Oasys is Open Architecture Synthesis Studio
Can I Install (Bristol Synthesiser Emulations on Linux) to oasys

Now after dicontinue of Oasys it is a Close Architecture Synthesis Studio.

If u looking for a tru open Archinetcure, u need Music Computing keyboards...

cello · Post by **cello** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 3:27 pm

Wish I understood the question...

ytl · Post by **ytl** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:10 pm

Thanks Chilly
Im a O-88 owner and I used MacBook Pro i7
after used many AU & VST , I understood Music Computing Keyboard Production Station & OpenLabs XXL （Win7 & OSX) can not compare with Linux Architecture Synthesis .
Now I just to compare LIONSTRACS & Kronos
( I prefer Kronos )

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 4:55 pm

ytl wrote:Thanks Chilly
Im a O-88 owner and I used MacBook Pro i7
after used many AU & VST , I understood Music Computing Keyboard Production Station & OpenLabs XXL （Win7 & OSX) can not compare with Linux Architecture Synthesis .
Now I just to compare LIONSTRACS & Kronos
( I prefer Kronos )

well there is on their way 128bit technology and Window 8 which support it, so it will be tremendos horse power, 100 time more then any shity Yamaha Motif Xf can offer and Dave Polish sample libreries...

my 2 cent...

ytl · Post by **ytl** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:14 pm

chilly7 wrote:
ytl wrote:Thanks Chilly
Im a O-88 owner and I used MacBook Pro i7
after used many AU & VST , I understood Music Computing Keyboard Production Station & OpenLabs XXL （Win7 & OSX) can not compare with Linux Architecture Synthesis .
Now I just to compare LIONSTRACS & Kronos
( I prefer Kronos )
well there is on their way 128bit technology and Window 8 which support it, so it will be tremendos horse power, 100 time more then any shity Yamaha Motif Xf can offer and Dave Polish sample libreries...

my 2 cent...

Hi Chilly
I to take seriously this topic
now the difficult problem is Oasys just a P4 , sound is very very good ,
But the Kronos sound is to be close the Oasys

LIONSTRACS illustration

Still today, Windows based system are NOT able to running multiple ASIO/VST Host on same audio card( windows OS Issue). Still without also the possibility to jump in realtime for LIVE performace from one ASIO host to another Host just by pressing one desidered Multitask hardware key! Without the possibility to running Multiple ASIO Host, the Standard Windows PC products are NOT allowed to manage multiple Midi controllers for each independent running application. JUST ONE application at Time can be controlled and also only 32Bit system (3Gb RAM) for support the standard VST.

The future is based by Linux software with 64bit CPU/OS, Sounds STREAMING SYSTEM from HD and MULTIPLE ASIO/VST Support. Embedded closed dated recycled system will NEVER follow the 64bit CPU power, VST/ASIO and Video system. IF you are looking for VST Plugins, Multiple ASIO HOST,GIGA Sampler sounds,Video Streaming, Audio-Midi SEQUENCER Integrated,then your system and keyboard is ONLY the LIONSTRACS WORKSTATION.
what are your opinion

I have O-88,RADIAS-R, M3, V-synth v2,microKorg,EXS-1,KP3,Zoom-R24,
Kore2,Ivory2,..............

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 5:30 pm

ytl wrote:
chilly7 wrote:
ytl wrote:Thanks Chilly
Im a O-88 owner and I used MacBook Pro i7
after used many AU & VST , I understood Music Computing Keyboard Production Station & OpenLabs XXL （Win7 & OSX) can not compare with Linux Architecture Synthesis .
Now I just to compare LIONSTRACS & Kronos
( I prefer Kronos )
well there is on their way 128bit technology and Window 8 which support it, so it will be tremendos horse power, 100 time more then any shity Yamaha Motif Xf can offer and Dave Polish sample libreries...

my 2 cent...
Hi Chilly
I to take seriously this topic
now the difficult problem is Oasys just a P4 , sound is very very good ,
But the Kronos sound is to be close the Oasys

LIONSTRACS illustration

Still today, Windows based system are NOT able to running multiple ASIO/VST Host on same audio card( windows OS Issue). Still without also the possibility to jump in realtime for LIVE performace from one ASIO host to another Host just by pressing one desidered Multitask hardware key! Without the possibility to running Multiple ASIO Host, the Standard Windows PC products are NOT allowed to manage multiple Midi controllers for each independent running application. JUST ONE application at Time can be controlled and also only 32Bit system (3Gb RAM) for support the standard VST.

The future is based by Linux software with 64bit CPU/OS, Sounds STREAMING SYSTEM from HD and MULTIPLE ASIO/VST Support. Embedded closed dated recycled system will NEVER follow the 64bit CPU power, VST/ASIO and Video system. IF you are looking for VST Plugins, Multiple ASIO HOST,GIGA Sampler sounds,Video Streaming, Audio-Midi SEQUENCER Integrated,then your system and keyboard is ONLY the LIONSTRACS WORKSTATION.
what an your opinion

Hello

Well i did not want to start converstation but if u ask me i will answer.

Well my opinion was and is and always will be that: "AWRYTHING IS POSSIBLE, IT IS JUST METTER OF WILL U DO IT OR NOT"

so speaking about the topic, if folks and software developers will optimise Windows OS and their software, it will be possible to get as near the same result as on optimised Linyx.

But speaking about today, i guess even on Windows 7 64 bit it is possible to get great results for the most aplication and music needs

p.s. Righ now I have 3 year old computer, it was not top of the line when i bought it, i payed for it only 2000 dollards from Dell and on Windows 7 64 bit works great right now, i just cannot imagine why people complain about Windows 7 perfomance of 6000$ computers on Windows 7 OS thay bought right now if my old computer works so great....

ytl · Post by **ytl** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:00 pm

Hi Chilly
cannot imagine why people complain about Windows 7 perfomance of 6000$ computers on Windows 7...................me too,.........
My experience is
When I used 1or2 hour MacBook Pro the sound have the problem, I must be restart the computer,(nowi7,8Gb RAM)
So I to believe LIONSTRACS illustration
but Used on O-88 SEQUENCER & Audio Input ............approximately 8 to 10 hours.........

chilly7 · Post by **chilly7** » Thu Apr 28, 2011 6:55 pm

ytl wrote:Hi Chilly
cannot imagine why people complain about Windows 7 perfomance of 6000$ computers on Windows 7...................me too,.........
My experience is
When I used 1or2 hour MacBook Pro the sound have the problem, I must be restart the computer,(nowi7,8Gb RAM)
So I to believe LIONSTRACS illustration
but Used on O-88 SEQUENCER & Audio Input ............approximately 8 to 10 hours.........

well all computers are little bit pranky, when bad install can ruin awrything, so when i istall or configurate awrything, I try to do awrything carefuly. and always i defragment my hard disc awry week.

also my computer has alot of games but I install them very carefuly and I never install any pirated stuff on my computer and also when i have some problem with my computer I don't swear on it so probably that a sicret of stable perfomance on my pc.

because i don't know anybody who has floweless pc perfomance even with the top of the line computer with Windows nur with Linyx if thay swear on their computer often

Post by **Sharp** » Sat Apr 30, 2011 1:44 pm

so speaking about the topic, if folks and software developers will optimise Windows OS and their software, it will be possible to get as near the same result as on optimised Linyx.

Yes, but Windows is by design limited compared to the flexibility you have with Linux. Since Lionstracs are being used as an example, I can also tell you that Linux is only part of what makes a Lionstracs system so flexible.

Much like what KORG are doing with the KRONOS and OASYS, Linux is only the desktop OS and over that runs the actual keyboards OS which makes it behave as a musical instrument and not a PC stuffed inside a keyboard case.

The Lionstracs OS that sits on top of Linux allows you to load any number of VSTi and have them integrated with the keyboard much like a factory sound is displayed on any normal keyboard. So at no point do you feel like your operating a PC. You don't even see the VSTi running on the screen unless you want to. All it's sounds are displayed inside the Lionstracs OS just as any sound is displayed on a KORG.

Windows can't run more than one ASIO Host either, Linux can. How that benefits me as a Lionstracs user is that in ASIO HOST 1, I can have a complete setup of VSTi's configured a certain way, and to certain midi channels. Without shutting down anything, I can at the press of a button jump to another HOST that is running a completely different configuration of different programs and so on....

At no point am I shutting down software or loading new software. I can hot swap between countless different engines and programs in real time without even having to see the programs running on the screen. Try doing that on a Windows machine with the press of a single button.

Heck, I can even midi in different keyboards and have different HOST's all available to each midi keyboard all at the same time.

Now that's Open Tech.

Regards
Sharp.

Davidb · Post by **Davidb** » Sat Apr 30, 2011 3:06 pm

chilly7 wrote:
Now after dicontinue of Oasys it is a Close Architecture Synthesis Studio.

Also known now as CASYS .

Korg Forums