And I've got this GAS thing going on RIGHT NOW!
So I just bought a NIB Kronos 61 for a price I just couldn't resist

Seems I can get used to "less keys" after all.
Out goes my TEX76..it will be sorely missed

Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
The synth legends stuff contains really nice sounds: there's a lot I like at first glance in the demos. The whole subject of providing "synth legends" patches is a key feature for selling modern synths and workstations (see Arturia with their synth hero patches). The vintage sounds requests in this forum show the same user interest.bsbsantos wrote:The JUPITER Synth Legends Package is great.
And WOW, Roland is not selling them for US$250!!!
It really seems Roland is embarassed by the legends of the past. They just don't get it - there are musicians who want the entire history of acoustic instruments on the keyboard, and there are synthesists (also musicians) who want to make music out of the sound of analog circuits. Roland has a great ability to polarize and divide and they judge what is acceptable rather than cater to everybody.It would be MUCH smarter from Roland IMHO to build real VA modelling synths of their legends for use in a workstation, like Korg already did.
Psychical modelling? That would be shear madness!plisken wrote:I was told they plan to differentiate themselves with there new workstation. This would be with a focus on psychical modeling or what roland like to call "supernatual". How It was explained to me was, mastering psychical modeling would allow them to skip over what has becoming mainstream now, big sample library's. psychical modeling is what they have been focusing on and plan to do so.
Roland might have financial constraints- we discussed their recent large losses on the Integra 7 thread.Jan1 wrote:At the moment Roland is under-represented in the workstation market.
They only have 2 old Fantom-G models and the Juno Gi at the lower end.
Yamaha has the XF, the MOX and the MX range, and KORG the KRONOS, the Krome and the Microstation, so I consider it to be very likely that Roland will come up with a new workstation in 2013.
It simply does not make sense that they surrender the marketshare for workstations to the competitors, especially considering the effort they put in developing the supernatural modeling technology.
In the light of the versatile platform of the OASYS/KRONOS both Yamaha and Roland have some catching up to do.
I believe Kronos offers wave sequencing, just like the Wavestation. It'd be a matter of converting the original factory soundbanks from the WS to the Kronos format.BillW wrote:Haven't heard any rumors, but I'd love to see more of the "Legacy" collection ported to the Kronos, especially the Wavestation.
There is/was also the GW-8 in the low price segment which came with a sequencer on par with Kronoss, meaning: no piano role editor.Jan1 wrote:At the moment Roland is under-represented in the workstation market.
They only have 2 old Fantom-G models and the Juno Gi at the lower end.
Yamaha has the XF, the MOX and the MX range, and KORG the KRONOS, the Krome and the Microstation, so I consider it to be very likely that Roland will come up with a new workstation in 2013.
It simply does not make sense that they surrender the marketshare for workstations to the competitors, especially considering the effort they put in developing the supernatural modeling technology.
In the light of the versatile platform of the OASYS/KRONOS both Yamaha and Roland have some catching up to do.
I'd say that the workstation market is actually the biggest one for the most simple reason that workstations are the most versatile keyboards. You can use them anywhere, be it in the studio or on the stage. Live players who don't need a sequencer simply don't use it.GregC wrote: The workstation market is small. I would imagine Roland , since they are behind the curve on workstations, lost share to Yamaha and Korg. With the Kronos and Krome , Korg is doing great and has revitalized interest in the workstation market.
I think GregC is right. professional workstations are only for pro musicians.. And there are not much of pro musicians out there scattering in the world.. Not saying that i'm a pro musicians because i had kronos.. Well maybe not a pro musician.. but a serious musician who gigs and create music a lot..sani wrote:I'd say that the workstation market is actually the biggest one for the most simple reason that workstations are the most versatile keyboards. You can use them anywhere, be it in the studio or on the stage. Live players who don't need a sequencer simply don't use it.GregC wrote: The workstation market is small. I would imagine Roland , since they are behind the curve on workstations, lost share to Yamaha and Korg. With the Kronos and Krome , Korg is doing great and has revitalized interest in the workstation market.
A 64 note piano... and people suggested that 73 instead of 76 was an odd decision. It actually looks like quite a practical instrument.sani wrote:
And maybe I or we are completely wrong because this is what Roland created for the NAMM 2013:
http://rolandconnect.com/product.php?p=vr-09
http://rolandconnect.com/product.php?p=rd-64
http://rolandconnect.com/product.php?p=bk-3