Last post on this level
Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2011 6:55 am
Just for the record….a good attorney defending the guilty takes the truth and uses symmetry to reverse it. Sanderxpander is trying to do this and xmlguy is acting in desperation to do so. At no time did I insult him (or xmlguy) and despite his "provoking" me I was very respectful to him as my posts show. His last reply is the ultimate copout. As is xmlguy’s “For the record, I haven't referred to the CERN information at all.”
Why would I be banned for following Korg Forum Guidelines? He is trying to use psychology to lower my group status and that often works….. on unintelligent people. The lesser diesis is straight out of Music Theory which is the proven mathematics of harmonics and its physics is obviously related to Music even if he or the other 3 cannot understand it…or care not to try. Its introduction into a top level Music Forum is well placed especially since it’s a follow up to something that held attention long before 3 of these guys breaking Korg Forum rules were even members of this forum.
This is a site for Professional Musicians as well as people who want to be of that caliber to establish their growth. The Professionals here should not be penalized by individuals that “want” to be professionals but cannot understand 9th grade mathematics and instead chose to insult and attack a person’s character in an animal based group manner. The mathematics used by the Professional Musicians and technicians on this forum far exceeds what I posted to show something very simple yet amazing for the forum membership to see. There is and always has been attached to Music a greater depth of understanding than held by the average non-musician that is held by many members of this Forum and certainly the Great Musicians of our Time such as the Beatles. Professional Musicians do not attack people supporting such awareness to be blunt; an awareness xmlguy will never possess IMO as he wanders lost in his own reactionary self-generated fog.
CERN and SLAC’s E158 data represent billions and billions of research dollars spent and years of research time put in by countless scientists and was used to show a circle completed that started on Korg Forum and goes back to my first “off topic” post that remained in the News section for almost a year linked to off topic: The Weak Force is an Oscillator. Those that participated in the deep symmetry of the UFT thread understand what that means at least to some degree as well the price of aspirin. Dealing with true symmetry in relationship to the Observer in relativity is difficult but some here did it. If you don’t “get it” then get out some old Beatles records and listen to the words because physics just “got it”. The scientists have no choice but to accept what their own data tells them. Einstein was right…..no more dice. Real inertial frame based time is back! Newton would have never let it go.
Aciphecs said: “For me it was when he posted his Fabio-look-alike and Chief-rants-alot pictures in this thread.” Aciphecs you seem to forget that “this thread” was pepperpotty’s own “get to know you” thread. But your reaction and statement in violation of this Forum’s rules attacking a member’s appearance certainly shows your need for “other” people’s attention and support to follow. And when was the last time you turned down a modeling contract BTW? That “Fabio” picture was taken by Stuart Price but I find the whole “social status” thing based on looks and appearance a bit disgusting and find what is in a person’s heart is far more important as in the end it controls the outcome of the outer filter that forms our bodies anyway. If that is what brother’s you….you have a real problem with your own self-image I’d say. I have always been a mirror to others and laugh when some describe me especially the defendants in my lawsuit harming so many people for their own greed. For how could I be so many different people? Good people see me as good, bad as bad (for stopping them), and idiots as idiots (for informing them).
xmlguy said: “Feel free to post links to any credible scientists who directly agree with you and specifically refer to your posts as news.”
I just posted the figures available on Korg Forum since it was open 6 hours ago on Nature magazine’s site that as a whole represents “credible” and it’s now too busy to get through but here is where the “real scientists” stopped posting rebuttals, about as close to agreeing as it will get till zillions of calculations are done and the politics even out. Nature states posts are vetted (removed), but I’ve never seen a change to larger font size before. I wonder who edits the forum. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110922/ ... 1.554.html
Post 27341 was a “credit decoy” as I recalculated immediately but it got SLAC E158 search hit rate going up and 27540 was my first accurate with lesser diesis posted. But best evidence is the increase in Google search page numbers on SLAC E158 since Oct 3, 2011 as money is a strong incentive to take what you can and call it your own as Rosalind Franklin learned, the scientist who captured the DNA’s X-Ray.
“Your claim seems to be news only in your own little world, not the real world.”
That is also exactly what you said about my legal situation which you know is a lie but were willing to discredit me by saying it. I always thought you had a real issue with seeing reality as it is. I now know that for a fact.
“since nobody else in their right mind and with any credibility has seen fit to agree with you and announce it for themselves as news.”
LOL…the mathematics did that for me and certainly there is a reason the high caliber rebuttals just suddenly stopped….right after my posts except this one right below my first post.
“Dear Antonio Ereditato,
I am taking you up on your appeal for scrutiny of the results from the OPERA experiment that you made public at a BBC News interview on September 22nd, 2011 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484) : we want just to be helped by the community in understanding our crazy result because it is crazy. When I heard your name on TV, in newspapers, etc. I was reminded of, and hopefully you will recall, the several dinners and gatherings over several years we shared at CERN 30 years ago with Luciano Ramello, Tiziano Camporesi, Mario Caria, Vittorio Remondino, etc. when I was working at CERN on the trigger of the Delphi experiment. Here is my scrutiny of the results of your experiment.” Cut, very long post.
“Believe me, it was not trivial for me to design DUT (Device Under Test) boards at the Superconducting Super Collider in 1992 for the HP8200 half-million dollar test station of integrated circuits with a time resolution accuracy of 50 picoseconds at all pins of the device under test. I was certain that my design and circuit implementation were correct only by comparing signals.” Cut
“In research it is important to discuss, identify, and implement scientific procedures that allow the laws of nature to be understood”
And that is exactly what I did. I used their procedure’s data to show the function of the neutrino in nature is to transfer photon energy from the weak force into the strong force just as was discussed on this forum years ago (without the neutrino named as the part used) and I used two separate groups of data considered unrelated to prove it, as well other observations past this forums scope of interest level that also support it.
There is a scale of probability used in experiments and when you do what I have done, take CERN’s 6-sigma data and SLAC’s 6.3 sigma data extended to a moment arm of 1000 years meaning it is even more accurate by its extended scale, and combine them to check each other based on a theory (UFT) proven correct if they do, and they not only do but fall within a level of accuracy that cannot exceed a 6-sigma+ based figure of error (size of comma produced) that is below 2.5 Nano seconds you have a result that far exceeds a 6-sigma rating and may even be within an area of immeasurable error by today’s standards….which won’t last long after the UFT invades physics to add real inertial frame based time back in the books on physics and make that measurement look sloppy.
“you claimed to have proven something”
Yes I have…and it is quite obvious, but I’m afraid its way over your head to understand since you refuse to look and would rather make up stories that harm people to support your view of reality required to support your view of politics and associated physics.
What you said about me…is really what you are saying about yourself in truth and that goes for Mr. Handsome who I wouldn’t trust to put in a light bulb and understand the reaction. “Of course his last post is another whiny rant towards xml.” (After I called him a clown….which I’m not really because clowns aren’t this creepy and you can tell I’m a professional by my hands on instrument approach….and check out the headphones.) “Bottom line is Korg forums ought to retain some sense of professionalism instead of being a public podium for psychobabble. We're sound designers, producers and keyboardists. Let John Hendry unload his baggage on some other schmuck's forum.”
Sharp’s not a schmuck…..and he said it was news because it’s obvious.
End of discussion on this level of this thread. If you cannot contribute, then don’t.
CERN’s v-c/c=2.48e-5 = SLAC 2.48e-5 +.20e-5 Einstein's Comma = Verification
John^^
Why would I be banned for following Korg Forum Guidelines? He is trying to use psychology to lower my group status and that often works….. on unintelligent people. The lesser diesis is straight out of Music Theory which is the proven mathematics of harmonics and its physics is obviously related to Music even if he or the other 3 cannot understand it…or care not to try. Its introduction into a top level Music Forum is well placed especially since it’s a follow up to something that held attention long before 3 of these guys breaking Korg Forum rules were even members of this forum.
This is a site for Professional Musicians as well as people who want to be of that caliber to establish their growth. The Professionals here should not be penalized by individuals that “want” to be professionals but cannot understand 9th grade mathematics and instead chose to insult and attack a person’s character in an animal based group manner. The mathematics used by the Professional Musicians and technicians on this forum far exceeds what I posted to show something very simple yet amazing for the forum membership to see. There is and always has been attached to Music a greater depth of understanding than held by the average non-musician that is held by many members of this Forum and certainly the Great Musicians of our Time such as the Beatles. Professional Musicians do not attack people supporting such awareness to be blunt; an awareness xmlguy will never possess IMO as he wanders lost in his own reactionary self-generated fog.
CERN and SLAC’s E158 data represent billions and billions of research dollars spent and years of research time put in by countless scientists and was used to show a circle completed that started on Korg Forum and goes back to my first “off topic” post that remained in the News section for almost a year linked to off topic: The Weak Force is an Oscillator. Those that participated in the deep symmetry of the UFT thread understand what that means at least to some degree as well the price of aspirin. Dealing with true symmetry in relationship to the Observer in relativity is difficult but some here did it. If you don’t “get it” then get out some old Beatles records and listen to the words because physics just “got it”. The scientists have no choice but to accept what their own data tells them. Einstein was right…..no more dice. Real inertial frame based time is back! Newton would have never let it go.
Aciphecs said: “For me it was when he posted his Fabio-look-alike and Chief-rants-alot pictures in this thread.” Aciphecs you seem to forget that “this thread” was pepperpotty’s own “get to know you” thread. But your reaction and statement in violation of this Forum’s rules attacking a member’s appearance certainly shows your need for “other” people’s attention and support to follow. And when was the last time you turned down a modeling contract BTW? That “Fabio” picture was taken by Stuart Price but I find the whole “social status” thing based on looks and appearance a bit disgusting and find what is in a person’s heart is far more important as in the end it controls the outcome of the outer filter that forms our bodies anyway. If that is what brother’s you….you have a real problem with your own self-image I’d say. I have always been a mirror to others and laugh when some describe me especially the defendants in my lawsuit harming so many people for their own greed. For how could I be so many different people? Good people see me as good, bad as bad (for stopping them), and idiots as idiots (for informing them).
xmlguy said: “Feel free to post links to any credible scientists who directly agree with you and specifically refer to your posts as news.”
I just posted the figures available on Korg Forum since it was open 6 hours ago on Nature magazine’s site that as a whole represents “credible” and it’s now too busy to get through but here is where the “real scientists” stopped posting rebuttals, about as close to agreeing as it will get till zillions of calculations are done and the politics even out. Nature states posts are vetted (removed), but I’ve never seen a change to larger font size before. I wonder who edits the forum. http://www.nature.com/news/2011/110922/ ... 1.554.html
Post 27341 was a “credit decoy” as I recalculated immediately but it got SLAC E158 search hit rate going up and 27540 was my first accurate with lesser diesis posted. But best evidence is the increase in Google search page numbers on SLAC E158 since Oct 3, 2011 as money is a strong incentive to take what you can and call it your own as Rosalind Franklin learned, the scientist who captured the DNA’s X-Ray.
“Your claim seems to be news only in your own little world, not the real world.”
That is also exactly what you said about my legal situation which you know is a lie but were willing to discredit me by saying it. I always thought you had a real issue with seeing reality as it is. I now know that for a fact.
“since nobody else in their right mind and with any credibility has seen fit to agree with you and announce it for themselves as news.”
LOL…the mathematics did that for me and certainly there is a reason the high caliber rebuttals just suddenly stopped….right after my posts except this one right below my first post.
“Dear Antonio Ereditato,
I am taking you up on your appeal for scrutiny of the results from the OPERA experiment that you made public at a BBC News interview on September 22nd, 2011 (http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-15017484) : we want just to be helped by the community in understanding our crazy result because it is crazy. When I heard your name on TV, in newspapers, etc. I was reminded of, and hopefully you will recall, the several dinners and gatherings over several years we shared at CERN 30 years ago with Luciano Ramello, Tiziano Camporesi, Mario Caria, Vittorio Remondino, etc. when I was working at CERN on the trigger of the Delphi experiment. Here is my scrutiny of the results of your experiment.” Cut, very long post.
“Believe me, it was not trivial for me to design DUT (Device Under Test) boards at the Superconducting Super Collider in 1992 for the HP8200 half-million dollar test station of integrated circuits with a time resolution accuracy of 50 picoseconds at all pins of the device under test. I was certain that my design and circuit implementation were correct only by comparing signals.” Cut
“In research it is important to discuss, identify, and implement scientific procedures that allow the laws of nature to be understood”
And that is exactly what I did. I used their procedure’s data to show the function of the neutrino in nature is to transfer photon energy from the weak force into the strong force just as was discussed on this forum years ago (without the neutrino named as the part used) and I used two separate groups of data considered unrelated to prove it, as well other observations past this forums scope of interest level that also support it.
There is a scale of probability used in experiments and when you do what I have done, take CERN’s 6-sigma data and SLAC’s 6.3 sigma data extended to a moment arm of 1000 years meaning it is even more accurate by its extended scale, and combine them to check each other based on a theory (UFT) proven correct if they do, and they not only do but fall within a level of accuracy that cannot exceed a 6-sigma+ based figure of error (size of comma produced) that is below 2.5 Nano seconds you have a result that far exceeds a 6-sigma rating and may even be within an area of immeasurable error by today’s standards….which won’t last long after the UFT invades physics to add real inertial frame based time back in the books on physics and make that measurement look sloppy.
“you claimed to have proven something”
Yes I have…and it is quite obvious, but I’m afraid its way over your head to understand since you refuse to look and would rather make up stories that harm people to support your view of reality required to support your view of politics and associated physics.
What you said about me…is really what you are saying about yourself in truth and that goes for Mr. Handsome who I wouldn’t trust to put in a light bulb and understand the reaction. “Of course his last post is another whiny rant towards xml.” (After I called him a clown….which I’m not really because clowns aren’t this creepy and you can tell I’m a professional by my hands on instrument approach….and check out the headphones.) “Bottom line is Korg forums ought to retain some sense of professionalism instead of being a public podium for psychobabble. We're sound designers, producers and keyboardists. Let John Hendry unload his baggage on some other schmuck's forum.”
Sharp’s not a schmuck…..and he said it was news because it’s obvious.
End of discussion on this level of this thread. If you cannot contribute, then don’t.
CERN’s v-c/c=2.48e-5 = SLAC 2.48e-5 +.20e-5 Einstein's Comma = Verification
John^^
