Free Wiener Grand Piano with 10 Velocity Layers

[ed_f]

I must apologize Garfield. I had no intention of disrespecting you or your work. I was, in no way, trying to insult you. I was actually trying to encourage you and I'm very sorry that it was taken the wrong way. Thanks for sharing it.

+1 So rare to see this on a forum - nice!

[Zeroesque]

Frankly, I thought phattbuzz gave some great complimentary feedback and constructive criticism in a direct way. That's awesome to have as a developer. I would have thought it could be a great start to a discussion on making something better, but instead it turned into immediate and unnecessary retaliation, something that I've now seen in another similar thread. No thanks.

[MRedZac]

Frankly, I thought Phatbuzz gave some great complimentary feedback and constructive criticism in a direct way. That's awesome to have as a developer. I would have thought it could be a great start to a discussion on making something better, but instead it turned into immediate and unnecessary retaliation, something that I've now seen in another similar thread. No thanks.

Hm. I don´t want to be unkind but I cannot see the point - "Provided as is" means "Provided as is". What part of the scentence is so hard to understand ? - I accept Phatbuzz apologies, if he didn´t mean what he wrote in a bad way, and I deeply respect offering an excuse by posting it here, but to explain my answer, to me it sounded like, that I have to be responsible and take the warranty on what I shared, and that it has to be me, fixing it... Like I would be responsible for that he "cannot rely on the sound, yet." - I am not.

I´m simply sharing what has been "developed" so far and as I always write by "Provided as is" in the first post, it´s for and up to people to make whatever they want from it. I´m not interested in and I think, it´s also not my part, to make something better on an already shared libary, cause if I share something, from my point of view it´s already good enough to fullfill for me, what it was made for or I would ask for comments on how to make it better... If it does not fulfill other people needs or expectations, it's a pity, but sorry, none of my business... I don´t force anybody to use it and I´m tired of being critizised for shared stuff, preferable from those people, who never share anything, or those, who are not even able to spell the word sampling correctly. (And no, this time I´m not talking about phattbuzz...)

So if you want to discuss here, what to make better on it, just go on, but please, don´t expect me to be the one, doing the work for you, like I (mis-)understood the tenor of phatbuzz posting before... I already invested a couple of days into it and one thing should be clear: If I would have done something else during this time, like posting criticism on other members work, there would be even nothing to discuss about now...

Cheers
Garfield

[Diego5150]

I must apologize Garfield. I had no intention of disrespecting you or your work. I was, in no way, trying to insult you. I was actually trying to encourage you and I'm very sorry that it was taken the wrong way. Thanks for sharing it.

+1 So rare to see this on a forum - nice!

Kudos Phatbuzz, I try to be as polite as possible but I don't think I would have been able to restrain myself like you did. Very classy.

[rs.felicio]

Garfield,

Just to say thank you for sharing this excelent samples.
The same for the "Sax packs" and for the Hammond PCG.

Really thanks for your job.
Rubinho