Dniss wrote:Hi Greg,
You are way more familiar then I with the Kronos. But not sure how that would affect polyphony, unless you want to layer all synth engines together. Which is already a no-no. The way I understand it, that limit should remain the same.
Since the Kronos is already different synth modules architecture, it must have been coded and integrated together in the same modular way. So adding another engine wouldn't be a complete redo of the OS. But that is pure speculation, not based on Kronos facts.
Didn't they add modules to the Oasys? Maybe it wasn't a commercial success.
Polyphony problems are created by custom mega Combis that might also rely heavily on Karma.
I am not into that exactly- but I record heavily on the SEQ, multi tracks. and I copy the juiciest programs into the SEQ .
Its not a huge issue for the most part. But its possible to push the limits and its good to be aware by watching the Performance Meters. and listening to dreaded 'pop's or popping noises.
I am not astute on the technical side to guess at how 'expandable ' the Kronos is at the OS level.
If it is in fact 'expandable ', and doesn't break the threshold or operating ceiling, there is going to be a cost of development of the engine. I am quite sure Korg is going to cover themselves with a new expensive feature. Assuming thats work that Korg wants to do. It has to make business sense for Korg.
Again, we really don't know ' how expandable ' or 'if expandable ' the Kronos is.
Its been 6 years,,, I am hearing crickets....
