absolutely, the vowel lead from the ms20 is instant funk !SanderXpander wrote:I think PolySix and MS20 are great for funk!
also the polysix is fantastic and very recognisable for those styles.
Moderators: Sharp, X-Trade, Pepperpotty, karmathanever
I recently wached this video.QuiRobinez wrote:if you are mainly playing the styles of JMJ, Jan Hammer. 80's and Funk then i don't find the virus ti a good choice, although it can do it's work especially on the lead area i think there are better solutions for those styles. But since you have had a virus ti desktop you know what you can do with it and how it sounds, so if you want one again then i think it's a good choice based on your previous experience with it.
I also use a virus ti, but mainly for dance and trance sounds. One thing i would suggest is to look at the tone control area of your kronos by pressing the tone control button. I have a feeling that not many people use it and you can do quite a lot with it. You can even assign your own parameter preferences to it, so that would make the use of the touch screen a lot less needed. Off course you still need the touch screen for the fine tuning things, but that's the same on a virus ti where you also need to dive into the menus for finetuning things.
I even consider Reason and the PX7.Scott wrote:ON a side note... you might want to keep your eyes out for a used Yamaha DX200. Also, check out the iPad apps, TF7 and DXi.robinkle wrote:If there ever will be a MOD-7 knobby synth I would have no problem buying one. But there is no synth like that now
...
If I sell my Kronos there is a chance I will miss MOD-7, because of my gear sluttyness, and because that I really like FM synthesis.
I use both Logic 9 and Cubase 7. I've used FM8 as a demo. If I could only like programing with a mouse. PX7 is quite easier I think but still. Hardware FM is the way to go. I agree on the NL4 it's a great alternative.SanderXpander wrote:I don't know if you have a decent DAW setup but since there is no benefit for you programming wise, FM8 is a very capable FM synth to keep on the side.
If you're bent on replacing the K with an inspiring knobby synth I would also really consider a Nord Lead 4. They're very funky and while not the most vintage sounding per se, they have a great character well suited to JMJ AND funk. The 4 is wonderfully alive sounding.
Yes. It's a natural suggestion.SanderXpander wrote:I don't like programming by mouse either. I just figured since you don't like programming Mod7 either it wouldn't be too much of a setback and you'd have a very good FM engine.
I've seen some A1 videos, it sounds very nice as far as I can tell. It looks a bit limited though. But it's typical clavia to make deep synthesis available on the frontpanel in a smart way.Lou wrote:Another option is the new Nord Lead A1 to be released in March April. It has all the features of the A4 but was specifically built to simplify programming and achieve your sound goals much faster. Very nice features and street price seems to be well worth it. I'm giving it consideration and also have thoughts and feelings about moving on from Kronos for the same reasons you posted. Check it out there are some very nice videos…
I was waiting to see whether Access would be bringing forth a new TI3 but it didn't happen as of yet. Also there are just too many posts about the TI's functionality with a DAW.
Actually I share your impression about the Virus Ti. The funky stuff i mentioned are basically covered by the XV-3080 and FM. I need sharp EP's and punchy basses. But for the mid range JMJ stuff is where The virus fits inn in my opinion because I don't want that part of the music to dominate the EP's and Bass, or drums for that matter. The virus feels soft airy kinda, there is some Oxygene to it, especially the phaser effect which I think is great.jimknopf wrote:I think you completely misjudge the sound of the Virus from the video above. The Kronos offers much more for funk than the Access Virus will ever do.
The Virus is an extremely flexible board concerning VA pogramming for various styles. And it always nails the basics of all these styles, but not more, except for dance and ambience sounds: it neither has natural deep fat basses (you have to eq them most of the time) nor does it have a vivid high range in the leads.
In fact the leads from a TI / TI2, for any other than trance and ambient sounds, do sound quite dreadful in my ears when played in loud band context: they do sound like they have no vivid overdtones, just some artificial dead high end. In comparison to my Moogs they always have been too artificial sounding for my band mates as well: they don't like to hear soloing from this synth.
The TI can be a real chameleon in the midrange, especially for modern dance sounds, and that makes it so desirable for many. But it is no genuine funk, r&b and electric jazz synth at all from my view. And I DO like it for what it still delivers.
I even found the video a bit misleading, because my Virus TI definitely does not sound as warm as this demo did sound (perhaps postprocessed?).
Dark, yes, but not vivid and juicy and really warm at all (in the sense of let's say an Oberheim), and that is needed for funk. Even the Kingkorg VA offers much more analog-like character than the TI does for such kinds of music.
Concerning the TI, I even bought a Virus RackXL again recently, and maybe will sell my TI keyboard, because in my ears the C series has a slightly better, more natural VA sound than the TI has. It fits better into the sonic context of Kronos, Moogs and Kingkorg here IMHO, because it is a little less mid range centered, and it sounds to me like it offers a bit more overtone quality. But that's just my impression.
+1 !jimknopf wrote:The Virus is an extremely flexible board concerning VA pogramming for various styles. And it always nails the basics of all these styles, but not more, except for dance and ambience sounds: it neither has natural deep fat basses (you have to eq them most of the time) nor does it have a vivid high range in the leads.
In fact the leads from a TI / TI2, for any other than trance and ambient sounds, do sound quite dreadful in my ears when played in loud band context: they do sound like they have no vivid overdtones, just some artificial dead high end. In comparison to my Moogs they always have been too artificial sounding for my band mates as well: they don't like to hear soloing from this synth.
I've heard tons of demos of the nord lead synths and I agree, the nl4 and nla1 sounds great. I think you describe them pretty well, I think they are funky. I think also from the demos I've heard of the KingKorg it's a bit of the same, there is a certain bite to it. The Virus TI sounds a bit more lush and Dreamy kind of.QuiRobinez wrote:+1 !jimknopf wrote:The Virus is an extremely flexible board concerning VA pogramming for various styles. And it always nails the basics of all these styles, but not more, except for dance and ambience sounds: it neither has natural deep fat basses (you have to eq them most of the time) nor does it have a vivid high range in the leads.
In fact the leads from a TI / TI2, for any other than trance and ambient sounds, do sound quite dreadful in my ears when played in loud band context: they do sound like they have no vivid overdtones, just some artificial dead high end. In comparison to my Moogs they always have been too artificial sounding for my band mates as well: they don't like to hear soloing from this synth.
I only use the virus ti for dance and ambient and then it shines like a bright star, but for every other purpose it's a midrange sounding synth in my opinion.
The mentioned Nord Lead 4 is a fantastic sounding synth, but the sound is a little bit more cold and in your face then other comparable VA synths. The Nord A1 isn't a Nord Lead 4, although it has parts of the NL4 engine it's quite limited in what you can do with it. For instance when using the shape function for Osc 1 then you loose Osc 2. I wouldn't recommend it, if you want a great Nord sound then go for the NL4 instead of the A1.
Another nice synth would be the King Korg. The filter models are really great and it has lots of oscs and waves to create your sound with. Also it has a third Oscillator (the nl4 only has two). I find the sound of the King Korg warmer then the NL4 which makes the king korg more suitable for the styles you mentioned. But i think the king korg has a big overlap with the Kronos. Although it would be nice if we get the filter models on the kronos (which would be a big step up for the kronos filters).
One thing to think of is the work method you are using, if you want use all your sounds together without prerecording them during a project then polyphony is a big issue. I heared you say that you can use 16 channels on the Virus TI. Although this is true in theory, you will never reach that amount of channels in reality. You can trick your way by splitting heavy patches on odd and even channels (because one dsp is reserved for even channels and another dsp is reserved for odd channels) but even then i think the max of channels you can use stops around 6 till 8. That shouldn't be a problem if you are also using lot's of VST instruments but it's something you have to be aware of.
it will sound really good, quite different than a virus ti. But based on your description i think a virus ti would be a much better choice. For instance the Total recall funtion in a DAW or the usb sound streaming in your daw and the large polyphony would make it a better choice in my opinion.robinkle wrote: I think it helps narrowing things down a bit. But the desision isn't made.
Even though 4 octaves is a bit limiting for piano playing, I will still check out the NL4. I like the nord interface and sound. 4 part multitimbral isn't bad either. I'll give it a test.