ozy wrote:Citizen Klaus wrote:JR also makes a decent enough living from his music that he can afford to practice for like 10 hours a day.
I don't like Rudess,
but may I say that it's probably the other way around?
"he makes a decent living because he's been practicing 10 hours a day for some time"?
Does it sound sensible?
It happens to athletes, maybe it happens to musicians as well...
OT closed
It's probably more of a self-sustaining loop, at this point. He had all of that elite training, and put in all that practice time, to achieve virtuosity, which helped propel his success as a musician. That success, in turn, enabled him to practice more, thus reinforcing his position.
Back on track, I'm not quite sure I buy the arguments about the moral superiority of hammer actions. They're better, as Mr. Kay pointed out, for emulating the feel of one specific category of keyboard instruments, but they in turn demand a different approach to playing technique. If you play an organ engine using a weighted keybed, and you don't want to hurt yourself, you end up playing the organ like a pianist, rather than like an organist.
Back to Rudess, and as much as I love him as a musician, you can hear this whenever he plays a Hammond sound -- his glissandos are much less smooth than those of a proper organist doing palm smears. They sound more like piano glissandos, which makes sense, given that he's playing them on a piano-style keybed. He also tends to incorporate glissandos less often, focusing more on staccato block chords.
Now some of that, to be sure, is down to different approaches to playing. Even on the same type of keybed action, I wouldn't expect Jordan Rudess and, say, Brian Auger to play in an identical manner. At the same time, the fact that there appears to be a correlation between keybed action and differences in the sound of the performance suggests that the action at least contributes to -- even if it doesn't necessarily cause outright -- the sound of the end result.