Questions about compressing samples on the PA3X
Posted: Mon Nov 04, 2013 11:17 am
Hi all,
about two months ago I have purchased a PA3X-76 and, after installing the optional 128 Mb of RAM and filling the memory with the samples from my old PA2X, was intrigued by the possibility of compressing the samples themselves, thus doubling the capacity of the RAM up to 512 Mb.
So last week I decided to try this option, and the first thing that put me off was a warning saying that the whole process could take up many hours. Nevertheless, I decided to go on but after about 5 hours, when it was finally over, was horrified to find that many samples had sonic artifacts, usually in the form of a high pitched whine, making them useless.
Luckyly, I had my old set stored in the hard disk, so it was easy to reload all the samples in their uncompressed format and now everything is fine, but I am puzzled and would like to know if anybody has tried this compression procedure and if the results were satisfactory.
In particular, did you notice any artifacts? The quality of the samples was the same as before? The loading time was unchanged (i.e. was instantaneous) or was there a slight delay, especially with large samples?
I am asking because the temptation of loading more samples is great and it looks indeed a pity not to take advantage of this opportunity the PA3X has to offer.
Thanks in advance.
about two months ago I have purchased a PA3X-76 and, after installing the optional 128 Mb of RAM and filling the memory with the samples from my old PA2X, was intrigued by the possibility of compressing the samples themselves, thus doubling the capacity of the RAM up to 512 Mb.
So last week I decided to try this option, and the first thing that put me off was a warning saying that the whole process could take up many hours. Nevertheless, I decided to go on but after about 5 hours, when it was finally over, was horrified to find that many samples had sonic artifacts, usually in the form of a high pitched whine, making them useless.
Luckyly, I had my old set stored in the hard disk, so it was easy to reload all the samples in their uncompressed format and now everything is fine, but I am puzzled and would like to know if anybody has tried this compression procedure and if the results were satisfactory.
In particular, did you notice any artifacts? The quality of the samples was the same as before? The loading time was unchanged (i.e. was instantaneous) or was there a slight delay, especially with large samples?
I am asking because the temptation of loading more samples is great and it looks indeed a pity not to take advantage of this opportunity the PA3X has to offer.
Thanks in advance.