Pete is absolutely right ... do not compare Kronos concept with any other models or brands !karmathanever wrote:Sorry, don't agree at all - why? If Korg did this then basically they might as well forget the 4X and just continue to update the 3X??? You use the Kronos as an analogy
Korg decided to keep the same compatibility with a model that maintains the same subsystem and OS platform and
actually all Kronos versions are identical and can share almost the same resources when updated to the same OS
version , an innovate concept by users perspective but surely Korg loses financial resources by not selling an entirely
new model as used to do up to now !
Therefore Pa4X as all brands follows the well known tradition we are familiar , new features and new bigger Rom
library and of course only backwards compatibility as usual.
So as Pete said if they decide all PaSeries models of same generation like Pa300/600/900/Le/4X to share the same
style resources then all previous models must have new OS updates to support Pa4X resources since all share the
same motherboard (with different board Nand Ram max. 1GB like Le/Pa4X ) and the same Linux based OS with
different features that can be applied to any of them , even the disk streaming feature of Pa4X , then stop producing
next new Pa flagship and just update OS with new features !
Seriously , Do you think that it can ever happen ? I don't think so ...
In my opinion as a programmer , Pa3XLe of same generation can be injected with Pa4X OS and it's streaming and
localized resources and except display drivers that are incompatible with screen hardware , can be a Pa4X clone !
But never confuse previous flagship Pa3X or 2X/Pa800 of some generation DSP application based OS , with Pa4X
and others since they're totally different from latest generation arrangers and can never be compatible in any level !