Korg Forums

guitar players save the day for this problem..lol there are a number of midi footcontrollers that should work just fine.. most will require programming on a pc prior to use. nektar pacer logidy umi3 meloaudio midi commander tech21 mongoose hotone midi foot controller and quite a number more. i had ...

So, I finally purchased a PAAS, and it does seem that installation is idiot proof.. and yet i read the instructions anyway (not a first but close!..lol) went to global > audio & video > and verified speakers are checked.. and no sound.. uninstalled/reinstalled twice and still no sound.. have ran an ...

I frankly am not sure what your Pa5x related point actually is?.. If it is that Behringer is a good company then sure, yes they are... they make affordable stuff and trade quantity for low margins.. but so what?.. The arranger market is small, the arranger market for keyboards with quality sample ...

Any idea of the feel/weight of the 88 note keybed.. or suggestions on other products where this is?..or compares too?..

thx

Once you take away the influencers and the need for retailers to hype every singe product you will see this is ho-hum - its nothing special...its simply an mpc One with a keyboard.. At the end of the day an MPC is the wrong product for you unless the focus of your entire workflow is sampling stuff ...

@antonySharmman Well, First, as noted already above, given that there is no official notification of the demise of the PA4X it is thoroughly inappropriate for that comment in your OP. Secondly.. I visited your site and what immediately jumped out was the 500 ways I can brick my PA4X, destroy my ...

goosebumps.. ty ty ty

Whether you are looking for home use or pa/stage use, you cannot escape the fact that quality requires money... So if you justified the Pa4x even partly based upon its sound quality, then at least give the keyboard the chance to demonstrate it by using quality gear. I own, and have played through ...

First, a big thank you to Korg Italy for these styles.. I have been neglecting my pa4x lately due to work commitments so this will be a welcome reason to get back on track. below, there is zero reason for USB3 on a device like the PA4x.. if usb3 is low cost and ubiquitous fine, but i suspect there ...

Actually i simply cannot agree with this highlighted quote.. For synths, perhaps, but arrangers?.. absolutely not...its the arranger part of the instrument rather than the sound module that is equal or even more important.. after all, it is real easy to bolt on other sound modules, but impossible to ...

Nice patches I am familiar with the type of architecture the PA4x has..having owned a Fantom G6 for a long while, a four (PCM) oscillator subtractive synth but still having some angst with conversion of terms from Roland-Speak to Korg-esque.. One of the reasons I went with the PA4x was this level of ...

does not look like an arranger to me?..

Stating "digital workstation" would seem to be more like the successor to the Motif, but with the Montage sound engines...

thx folks

This is very confusing.. There is no reference to a 6th file in the downloaded package, and many other users are referencing .001 - .005 only can someone else comment pls?. After copying all 5 files on a USB (Pa4X_OS_and_Resources_v200.pkg.001, 002, 003, 004, and 005) As mentioned in the other ...

it looks like you may have selected the wrong download?..

my pa4x required pkg, i downloaded the pkg update and the files all have the .pkg extension...

perhaps you should attempt another download..?