Korg Forums

domc

Let me start by stating what this thread is NOT about.

Opinions on the sequencer on the Oasys and now Kronos generally fall into three categories
a) group A. Would like to use an onboard sequencer more - thinks it's way below par for an instrument of this calibre
b) group B. Use the sequencer on board - think it's workable - would probably welcome any upgrades
c) group C. Aren't that fussed about the sequencer, often use the instrument more for performance or in conjunction with software/other sequencers. Would rather future development time spent on new ExIs etc.

This thread is not to start another war between these groups - with someone stating how they fall into such group and why it is the most relevant. There are plenty of those threads around if one does a search.

Nor is it please for people to point out that they don't fall nicely into these groups.

*******************************************

The reason for my questions below is I've owned an Oasys since 2006 and am considering getting a Kronos. The new engines, hard disk streaming, ongoing support Wink

, drum track and computer link up (eventually), probably outweigh the loss of the great adjustable screen and drum pads. I'll never sell my Oasys - as it's given immense joy and in years to come I think it will be hailed a classic - but the world has moved on and Korg's energy is now in this new beast.

I 'get' most of the Kronos new design. The new unadjustable screen probably makes sense for the new price point. The pads were probably a hard design decision, but given the support now for nanopad, there's a good equivalent workaround. The size and weight all make sense. Hard disk streaming, two new engines - it's all good stuff.

But no progress on the sequencer in 6 years (aside from the resolution)- I just don't get it. In fact - a backwards step compared to what functionality the M3 now offers. What is the Korg philosophy on the sequencer topic?

Beginning over 5 years ago there are literally hundreds of posts with suggestions from the simple to the radical on how the sequencer might be improved with the great new touch screen real estate.

I seem to remember you (Dan) agreeing with a couple and saying you also would like to see that particular suggestion implemented. I also seem to remember vague hints that somethings may be improved in the future.

There was also a distinction raised somewhere of Korg Japan being responsible for the architecture around the sequencer (and I guess the Sampler which shares the same fate) with your team focusing on the engines. Is this still the case and part of the explanation?

I just don't understand how so much progress can be made on the engines over the past 5 years, and how none of the many good (and some probably relatively easy to accomplish) ideas for the sequencer never came through.

I would believe you if you told me that group C of my groups above is probably the largest, and carries the most sway - [and perhaps that it is sounds/engines/performance that are the largest factor in selling these workstations]. But there have still been enough voices raised from group's A and B about these sequencer aspects - that it clearly is a topic of interest to a considerable sized group of customers (and by extrapolation potential customers) and I just don't get at all why with that feedback from customers, it wouldn't be something that made business sense to improve rather than the back step that has been taken. There's such a great opportunity being missed of putting a much better sequencer with the great sounds. I can categorically say that I would have already bought the new Kronos if it's sequencer matched it's sound engines - rather than doing the extended period of research that I'm doing at the moment. There is still a market IMHO for a workstation product being able to do a lot of stuff (easily) in the same box.

Any thoughts you can share on the design philosophy here would be appreciated.

Kind regards, Dominic
_________________
Oasys 88
Kronos 88
Virus TI Keyboard
Octopus

runningman67 · Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 1:31 pm Post subject:

i like the sequencer.

I come from an old cassette, TASCAM porta studio background and I think the sequencer is a dream. I use it virtually everyday. Put a piano track down. add, then add again. Take away, put a pattern down. Change the sounds, the effects and panning, start again...........

I know alot don't rate it, but I love it.

So I must be a B in your catagories.

jimknopf · Platinum Member Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 3374

I just would like to confirm Dominics question. That's not meant reproachful.
I'm just interested to hear any kind of answer or explanation from Korg's side.
Why doesn't the sequencer develop in years?
This topic can't be a taboo, can it?
_________________
Kronos 73 - Moog Voyager RME - Moog LP TE - Behringer Model D - Prophet 6 - Roland Jupiter Xm - Rhodes Stage 73 Mk I - Elektron Analog Rytm MkII - Roland TR-6s - Cubase 12 Pro + Groove Agent 5

Kontrol49 · Platinum Member Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 1280

Well you can trace its lack of development to even further back...the sequencer is based on the Trinity days,and hasn't evolved much since then,they revamped it a little with the Triton series and included things like the Cue list and RPPR(although this was present in N series)Cue list was then dropped in Oasys???...

The Oasys merely has an Audio Recorder option over the Trinity/Triton...

I'd be interested to hear why they feel it doesn't need revamping or developing from the Triton or the lack of since those days,I cannot see after all these years how anyone at Korg uses these sequencers to great extent or are aware of other Workstation brands sequencers or why they feel a 16 track midi sequencer is acceptable in this day and age.(even the addition of 16 int and 16 Ext tracks rather than a compromise,would be a start)I'm kind of hoping they might have seen an evolution of the Sequencer with the Kronos...
_________________
--Korg Nautilus~~Korg Modwave--Korg SV-1-Korg Wavestate--

curvebender · Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:13 pm Post subject:

I am sure Dan has an opinion on this topic, but if I'm not mistaken, it's Korg Japan that handles the development of the sequencer, whereas Korg USA is responsible for sound design and EXi development, among other things.
_________________
Paul: Don't be nervous.
John: I'M NOT NERVOUS!!!

jerrythek · Platinum Member Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 2931

Shakil · Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 4:45 pm Post subject:

Kontrol.... I wouldn't say the sequencer didn't improve much since Trinity or Triton.. There were major improvements jnder the hood.. the most significant was ability to record sysex events... then came swing quantize...

And the audio recorder is huge too...

But, I do agree that KRONOS screams and deserves a more capable seqeencer....
_________________
Roland Fantom-G6 ARX1, Korg M3-m exb-Radias, Korg Z1-18v, Roland MC-808, Roland MC-909, Korg microKontrol.

ajarink · Joined: 19 Oct 2011 Posts: 7

I have worked with sequencers on Yamaha Motif, Roland Fantom and now on Kronos. I end up using these on-board sequencers as sketch pads only (when inspiration (in my case rarely) hits).
For on stage use I find the interface of all on-board sequencers too fiddly. Roland Fantom now has a mouse connection, which helps (but still no prizes won on ergonomics). Kronos is nano-fiddly (if that exists...). You have to use your finger nails to edit.

As long as it keeps working (the company is no longer with us), I use my Miditemp MSX. It also works with a touch screen even smaller than the Kronos real estate. It also has lit buttons you can't miss on a dark stage, and pedals you can assign functions to. I use it also to set the right presets on synthesizers, voice processing and mixing. It is a MIDI-guys wet dream and works quick with function keys.

For argument's sake: let's say I would have only the Kronos to do a gig with. In that case I would like to have:
1. All my songs autoload that are in the set list
2. Have a better view on channel names and instruments
3. A "global setting" for the click out channel that "just works" (so I can feed the drummer with it). Now sometimes the click-settings to a separate channel resets to internal. Again, this requires fiddling after the load of songs (something you tend to forget when you're shivering with stage fright).
4. Midi messaging to external systems (probably with SysEx, as you only have one MIDI out at your disposal), so you can set up your outboard gear.
_________________
Kronos 88, Motif 7, Fantom X7, Fantom X8, FC-300, Miditemp MSX, Yamaha LS9

EXer · Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 5:29 pm Post subject:

I would just like to quote

Kontrol49 · Platinum Member Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 1280

Lou · Posted: Mon Dec 05, 2011 6:44 pm Post subject:

jimknopf · Platinum Member Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 3374

jerrythek · Platinum Member Joined: 28 Jan 2002 Posts: 2931

Hi Jim:

What's the bottom line? I didn't post to make a "final" point regarding the state of the sequencer, as you are looking for. I just wanted to correct the information posted, which was incomplete, and therefore inaccurate. No 'dis to Kontrol49 - he was just making his point and "skimmed" the facts to get to his desired conclusion. And after years of living on forums I too often see people reading these brief synopsis as fact, and that's how misinformation grows. It's a pet peeve of mine. That's all.

But this is my view - Your observation is accurate - the sequencer in the OASYS/Kronos does not have all of Korg's current technology "assets". No one would argue that. As to how, and whether it will grow in the future is not something I can comment on.

Best regards,

Jerry

Kontrol49 · Platinum Member Joined: 04 Mar 2006 Posts: 1280

So if the sequencer doesn't have all of Korgs "assets" of the technology that is
Available does that mean that there is or has been further developments of the sequencer OS beyond the extras the M3 was given.....I'm sure of which even though you no longer have that connection with Korg you'd not disclose that info anyway nor would we want to misinform people skimming the facts....whether its a pet peeve or sheer irritant to you jerry those who use and own those respective workstations can see the significant changes and how little has really altered in the Kronos/Oasys

I'm sure you have a personal connection to the development,I'm not skimping facts or misinforming.merely pointing out the obvious of how little it's changed and when I say change I talk of those things that have a massive impact to the workflow or compositional tools not just a few things that should be there as standard after all the real lack of development is why the thread started in the first place
_________________
--Korg Nautilus~~Korg Modwave--Korg SV-1-Korg Wavestate--

aron · Posted: Wed Dec 07, 2011 3:51 am Post subject:

I have no idea how they designed the Kronos, but a lot of it seems modular. Hopefully the sequencer might be an upgrade in the form of a module or expansion. I wish they had decoupled the drum track completely as another independent module so I could switch modes etc... with it.
_________________
Korg Kronos, RD-88, Yamaha VL1, Deep Mind 6, Korg Kross, author of unrealBook for iPad.