|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
valhalla
Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 34 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Sun Jun 18, 2017 12:00 am Post subject: Becoming a Master Triton Sound designer |
|
|
There are people that are experts in sound design and those who are doing this as experts with the Korg Triton. Most likely these rare birds work for Korg. Why did they make learning this so encryptic? We spent a lot of money on the Triton and other keyboards but we get manuals that are worthless for anything other than over stating the obvious along with many esoteric if not encryptic information about programming / designing sounds. I have searched the internet for a long time and always hit dead ends. I bought some DVDs one time but they were worthless as they were filled with obvious basic information.
I have a highly technical background with a BS in Electrical Engineering and a Masters in Computer Science as well as being an experienced if not seasoned, musician. I have the IQ and the background to become an expert at this if I can just get someone to share this information with me. I need a source to help me comfortably learn this. It makes no sense to beat my head against the wall reinventing the wheel as it were, by trying to decypher the methodology to create and design sounds on the Triton, Motif, Fantom or any other synth. The number of permutations and combinations of parameters and settings makes it extremely daunting and to overwhelming to try to learn sound design this way.
Please, will someone help me find the path and direction to where I need to go to learn from a Master or expert or whatever you want to call them. Do I have to get a job with Korg just to accomplish this? It really should not be this difficult. I have never heard of a school or class that would teach this. A book is not really going to be of much help because with something like this you need to hear and see and try it first hand.
Can we try to collectively pick the brains and get a collaboration of all the people in this forum who know something about programming sounds and start creating a new section of this forum or a video for this type of tutorial???
Please make suggestions and give us your thoughts and input.
Thank you!
Valhalla |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mellontikos Junior Member
Joined: 01 Feb 2012 Posts: 96
|
Posted: Wed Jun 21, 2017 4:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Let me give it a shot. I can probably try to explain it in a way you can better understand.
This is basically what no one ever explained to me and I had to learn on my own:
I'm guessing that you don't really understand the difference in synthesis that well, so I will start from there.
As you know, sound is just vibration of the air that reaches your ears.
Someone found a long time ago, that there is a fundamental piece to sound: The Sine Wave.
Then they found that if you take Sine Waves, at different frequencies, and play them together, you can build other type of waves, like Sine Waves, Square Waves, etc etc.
This is what you'll see referred to as: Additive Synthesis
And when dealing with Additive Synthesis, you'll hear about the fundamental, and the overtones, etc. All that means is the Sine Waves that have to be played in a frequency and volume (amplitude) to generate other type of waves (almost like building a chord out of notes. C Major for example, is C, E, G).
Easiest way for you to understand it is to try it yourself:
https://meettechniek.info/additional/additive-synthesis.html
So the crazy thing is that, with enough sine waves, you can replicate insanely accurate sounds, like an Acoustic Piano's Timbre. I have no idea how many, but I'm guessing probably in the hundreds?
Wasn't practical back then. So before we continue, let's understand Subtractive Synthesis:
This one is much easier. The concept is that you don't build your Square or Saw Waves on your own (like with Additive), but rather the factory gives you a synth with prebuilt ones you can play with (let's say a Juno 106)
So that's what they call an "Oscillator", it's the circuit that is generating that wave. So let's say you select a Saw Wave and play it. You'll hear that typical Saw Wave sound, sharp, brassy and cutting.
So those synths come with another function called the "Low Pass Filter" which is almost literally like a knob that only cuts the treble out of the sound, but leave the bass/low end intact.
If you twist the knob, you'll be cutting, and restoring the high portion of the saw wave in real time, and this will sound like "Neeeeeeeeeeeoooooooooooommmmmmmmmmmmooooooooooooooooooooeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee"
That's what they call Subtractive Synthesis. Now usually you can do more, like add Resonance (which is just a function that loops the sound onto itself creating a resonant frequency, and gives it that squelchy sound (search for acid 303 on youtube), and other functions.
Resonance in particular is very sought after, because it makes sounds have that resonant "phaser" like effect, and sounds very futuristic.
So this is why you'll notice that Subtractive Synths are usually limited to Saw/Square type sounds, at which they excel. All the stuff people go crazy over (Juno, Jupiter 8, 303, etc).
FM synthesis is really very very similar to Additive Synthesis, but the Sine Waves aren't added together, but rather, the second sine wave directly modifies the first one, and the 3rd modifies the 2nd. Instead of being called Overtones they are caller Carriers. So this is not as good as "true" additive because the carriers are not able to control the volume of the sine waves created, but the method is so close that FM might as well be Additive Synthesis' retarded cousin. Still, due to this limitation, everything FM does sounds "metallic" and harsh. Great for Electric Piano sounds, as my favorite sounds of all time are "DX"ish style EP's.
Can additive synthesis recreate the same sounds as FM? Sure, with enough work, because FM is a hammer approach, probably would be 10 times as complex to make the same sound in a "true" additive synth, but not impossible.
Each style of synthesis is trying to recreate the same thing: real acoustic instruments. Each one fails miserably. Additive being the one with the potential to actually be successful, and maybe know they could do it with a VST, on a Core i7 with a gazillion Sine Wave OSC'
At that point, it's no longer called "Additive Synthesis" but rather "Physical Modeling". Technically, since tuning 2000 Sine Waves at the exact right frequencies and amplitudes to recreate a violin, complete with bow attack, and vibrato would be an insane task, instead, smart people have had their software analyze real people playing the violin, and the software learns how to create that exact range of waveforms, and play it back in real time, completely synthesized............................................or at least that's the idea. A few synths can do a very good job, but if someone can point me to a VST that can be played with all the nuances of a violin, I'd love to see it
Subtractive Synthesis, on the other hand, is limited to the waveforms programmed from the factory. Whatever waveform they created from the factory, that's what you get.
You can then slice it any way you want, with the low pass filter (treble cut), and if you're lucky, your synth is advanced, and has a high pass filter (bass cut), a bandpass filter (cut everything except mid frequencies), etc etc.
So you can get 100 variations of a Saw or Square, but they are *still* a saw and square.
So how to get real acoustic sounds then?
This is where the "ROMplers" come into play.
Someone figured out "Why the heck are we wasting time trying to synthesize real instruments? Why not just record someone playing the originals note by note, assign them to a keyboard, and everytime you play a key, it's like you're hitting "Play" on your CD player for that recorded sound?"
And Wavetable Synthesis was born, also known as "ROMPler". Hated by everyone yet everyone needs it, lol.
Wavetable, literally has the recordings of instruments as played by someone in real life, note by note, and permanently recorded onto your synth.
The Korg Triton is a Wavetable Synthesizer. Let's say you select "M1 Piano", or "SG Piano". If you play the note of C, you are playing back the prerecorded sound that Korg recorded originally in studio of a rinky dink (but very cool) piano sound at that note. If you play C major, you are hitting the "play" button for 3 recordings, etc etc.
Because you are just playing back recordings someone else made, there is no real "synthesis" going on, you're just playing back stock sounds someone else made. And this is why ROMPlers are hated by people obsessed with synthesis. You can't really do much with those sounds.
But, lucky for us, a ROMpler like the Triton, doesn't just have the stock recordings (which Korg calls multisamples). It has filters, just like a Subtractive Synthesizer (low pass filter, high pass, notch filter, and ever resonance, but it suuuuuuuucks on the Triton unfortunately), and it has up to 7 individually assigned effects (chorus, reverb, delay, distortion, etc etc)
So, like an old Subtractive Analog Synth, a ROMpler like the Triton can select an "Oscillator" and you can choose which sample to play back as if it was a waveform (Can't remember how many the Triton Extreme has, but I think it's over 1000, pianos, organs, bells, guitars, strings, special FX, etc etc)
So for you to "sound design" on a Triton, what you're really looking to do is how to combine this massive amount of things into cool, usable sounds.
If you go thru most of your Combis, you'll find a lot of them are just 4 or more sounds joined together (like Piano and Strings, or Piano and Bass). Or complex layers (4 or more separate strings connected together, etc)
So in a nutshell that's the basics right there. Let me know if you found it useful. _________________ Tyros 4. 01/Wpro. N5ex. SY99, Legacy M1, WS & Triton VST's. Wavestate Native VST |
|
Back to top |
|
|
PJammer3
Joined: 25 Sep 2011 Posts: 3
|
Posted: Sat Sep 30, 2017 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Valhalla,
I know how you feel. I too want to become a master sound designer. Alas, I'm just a hacker. Like you I am technical (Software Engineer) with the aptitude to learn (but not always the time). But here is what I have found in my meager efforts:
1) Real sound design (unless you are an expert already) takes a lot of time and dedication! Are you really dedicated to spend the time you need to become an expert?
2) To design really good sounds, you need to know what sounds you are going for. Sometimes you need some imagination (imagine new sounds), otherwise you are just duplicating what has already been done.
3) On the Triton Extreme, it is much easier and quicker to simply modify and tweak existing programs and combinations.
4) Just get started. Yes jump into the pool, the waters is warm! If you never start, you won't learn much.
5) I suggest start with a combi which you really like, but has something that annoys you (like a screeching sound, or missing a bass sound, ...). Then turn off the annoying sound, and/or replace it with what is missing for you. Then navigate around and play with other parameters to your liking. Usually within 15 -30 minutes I have a patch that sounds way better (to me) than what I started with. Save it! Meanwhile you begin to understand how Triton builds it's sounds.
6) Do the same with a program you like but want to change. The parameters will be much different than the combi's and now you will begin to understand a lower level of programming on the Triton.
7) If after you do the above, you are still willing to learn Triton programming at a deeper level, start messing with samples used within programs. Here there really is no limit (except your own imagination) to the original sounds you can make.
Have fun!!! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
wpostma Junior Member
Joined: 02 Mar 2018 Posts: 59
|
Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2018 12:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
Not sure what it means to be a sound designer for a Rompler keyboard, or a Sampler that mostly gets used as a Rompler, because Sampling is Freeking Hard.
I think that what would be interesting is to design new sounds, but I don't think that doing that ON the Triton makes any sense.
I sense the original post here comes from a sense that "making new sounds should be easy" on a Triton. It's a music production workstation, and a working instrument for gigging musicians, and home players, who want a vast array of pre-built sounds. It's also got a sampler capability, but it's hardly an auto sampler.
If you want something like an auto-sampler, check out Sample Robot.
http://www.samplerobot.com/
Just because it's got a manual and painstaking sampling capability doesn't make making new sounds easy, just grab Triton and be sound designer. The Triton Extreme has a huge amount of sounds on board. Frankly if you want to twist knobs and make sounds, this is the wrong synth for you. If you don't want to fiddle with microphones and assign multi-samples to key ranges, this is the wrong synth for you. If you want to pre-process audio after recording it, then just make sounds on your PC, and then convert them to PCGs and then add them to your keyboard. Why use a triton that can't do much audio processing compared to your PC, to make patches?
If you want to buy sample packs, it's a great synth for you. If you want to painstakingly create programs in pcg format, it's a great synth. What kind of sound designer do you want to be?
Just my opinion, but if the tool doesn't make what you want to do easy, maybe sell your Triton Extreme and get a Modular. Then get sample robot and take the weird s**t you create and make it into pcgs for the rest of us. _________________ Korg TR 88
Warren Canada |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simoniz
Joined: 09 Sep 2018 Posts: 6 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have any experience with synthesisers and audio equipment, the triton is actually quite simple to figure out. Sure, it has a few of it's own quirks in how it handles the sequencer, but the basics are the same format as the original Moog and everything since has used.
Make your sound:
OSC1 quality
OSC2 quality
Detune and/or pitch shift the oscillators
Adjust the filters (LPF/HPF)
Adjust the amps
Adjust the LFOs
Modulate Filters, Pitches, or Amps using LFOs
Continue tweaking until happy
Add in the effects chain
Add effects or don't until you're happy
If you want more meat, layer programs in combi mode (not necessary)
It's a petty straightforward design really. It tales many hours to become efficient with it, but that's like any instrument.
Let's say you bought a mandolin. It's a very nice mandolin that cost $3000. The instructions for how to play the mandolin are very basic, and anyone can learn the instructions in 10 minutes. Then you try to play your mandolin, and discover that you can't play very well. "I paid a fortune for this!" You declare, "they should make it easier to play!" You comb the internet looking for better instructions, but the only thing that can really help you learn the instrument is to practice, or to buy a beginner instrument.
The triton is just fine, in fact, it's one of the most powerful (THE most powerful, IMO) workstation you can get for $750 used. It's a steal even at full retail value!
You're going to have to sink many hours in before you get proficient with this particular machine, but it will be hours well spent, I promise.
I am very well-versed in analogue synthesis, and I'm still finding little gems inside the amazing triton that sees me rarely even touching my analogues anymore.
You'll be able to make sounds that people swear came from an old Moog. Hell, when I feed my Moog model d into an oscilloscopes, the saw down looks almost identical to the saw down MG (Moog) multisample housed in the vintage synth expansion of the triton (comes with the extreme).
Keep on practising, and remember to have fun. You'll get where you want to be, but it'll take hours and hours of playing. You'll wear your buttons out by the time you're a master synthesist. This is the machine to learn on. Sure, the curve is steep, but it's so much more rewarding to conquer this beast than you can imagine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
simoniz
Joined: 09 Sep 2018 Posts: 6 Location: Canada
|
Posted: Mon Sep 10, 2018 7:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If you have any experience with synthesisers and audio equipment, the triton is actually quite simple to figure out. Sure, it has a few of it's own quirks in how it handles the sequencer, but the basics are the same format as the original Moog and everything since has used.
Make your sound:
OSC1 quality
OSC2 quality
Detune and/or pitch shift the oscillators
Adjust the filters (LPF/HPF)
Adjust the amps
Adjust the LFOs
Modulate Filters, Pitches, or Amps using LFOs
Continue tweaking until happy
Add in the effects chain
Add effects or don't until you're happy
If you want more meat, layer programs in combi mode (not necessary)
It's a petty straightforward design really. It tales many hours to become efficient with it, but that's like any instrument.
Let's say you bought a mandolin. It's a very nice mandolin that cost $3000. The instructions for how to play the mandolin are very basic, and anyone can learn the instructions in 10 minutes. Then you try to play your mandolin, and discover that you can't play very well. "I paid a fortune for this!" You declare, "they should make it easier to play!" You comb the internet looking for better instructions, but the only thing that can really help you learn the instrument is to practice, or to buy a beginner instrument.
The triton is just fine, in fact, it's one of the most powerful (THE most powerful, IMO) workstation you can get for $750 used. It's a steal even at full retail value!
You're going to have to sink many hours in before you get proficient with this particular machine, but it will be hours well spent, I promise.
I am very well-versed in analogue synthesis, and I'm still finding little gems inside the amazing triton that sees me rarely even touching my analogues anymore.
You'll be able to make sounds that people swear came from an old Moog. Hell, when I feed my Moog model d into an oscilloscopes, the saw down looks almost identical to the saw down MG (Moog) multisample housed in the vintage synth expansion of the triton (comes with the extreme).
Keep on practising, and remember to have fun. You'll get where you want to be, but it'll take hours and hours of playing. You'll wear your buttons out by the time you're a master synthesist. This is the machine to learn on. Sure, the curve is steep, but it's so much more rewarding to conquer this beast than you can imagine. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
valhalla
Joined: 25 Dec 2010 Posts: 34 Location: Upstate New York
|
Posted: Fri May 22, 2020 3:30 pm Post subject: Thank you and I'm so sorry.... |
|
|
I got so frustrated trying to find information on learning the Triton's sound design parameters etc. that after posting this original post I drifted away until recently when I got motivated to try to find information again... When I saw all these responses I got inspired again. I'm sorry for not seeing these until now. I will read all of these carefully and then try to get some dialog going with you guys....if you are still out there. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|