|
Korg Forums A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world. Moderated Independently. Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
What Sequencer do you use. |
KORG built in Sequencer. |
|
40% |
[ 44 ] |
Other |
|
59% |
[ 64 ] |
|
Total Votes : 108 |
|
Author |
Message |
BasariStudios Approved Merchant
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 6510 Location: NYC, USA
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jimknopf wrote: | that's just wishful thinking, not realistic before 2 or 3 workstation generations ahead. |
Not really, its in the Krome already, piano roll, you can draw and stretch
lines in the Editor...e tc. _________________ http://www.basaristudios.com
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DennyC Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Dec 2008 Posts: 938 Location: Tucson, Az
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use both the sequencer in the Kronos and the Oasys. I tried to vote to no avail, so chalk up another vote for the Kronos. _________________ Kronos 2 61, Wavestation A/D, Yamaha Genos and others. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
RlaRed Junior Member
Joined: 19 Jul 2010 Posts: 92 Location: Katy, TX
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 8:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just voted that I use the sequencer in the Kronos, though I haven't tried it for editing actual MIDI yet too much. I was using a computer with Studio One but found that it detracted from musical experience, so I like that the Kronos is an all-in-one solution for me. _________________ Current Gear: Korg Kronos 2 88, Focusrite 18i8, Sonar Platinum, Win 10 64-bit, 8-gig ram
"The graveyards are full of indispensable men" - General Charles De Gaulle |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jimknopf Platinum Member
Joined: 17 Jan 2011 Posts: 3374
|
Posted: Sun Sep 16, 2012 9:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
BasariStudios wrote: | jimknopf wrote: | that's just wishful thinking, not realistic before 2 or 3 workstation generations ahead. |
Not really, its in the Krome already, piano roll, you can draw and stretch
lines in the Editor...e tc. |
Nedim, that's nice, but even with piano roll etc. software sequencers are specialized packets with tons of usful functionality not available on hardware sequencers - and the latter will need 2-3 more hardware generations to be at least principally able to catch up.
Both serve different purposes so far IMHO and will not be comparable for quite a while to come. Everyone should be aware of that, to get rid of completely unrealistic expectations.
But that's a vote FOR piano roll view and easier editing in the Kronos, not against, because it's useful and needed even for the limited onboard recording purposes. _________________ Kronos 73 - Moog Voyager RME - Moog LP TE - Behringer Model D - Prophet 6 - Roland Jupiter Xm - Rhodes Stage 73 Mk I - Elektron Analog Rytm MkII - Roland TR-6s - Cubase 12 Pro + Groove Agent 5 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Davidb Platinum Member
Joined: 21 Oct 2002 Posts: 1592
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
jimknopf wrote: |
But that's a vote FOR piano roll view and easier editing in the Kronos, not against, because it's useful and needed even for the limited onboard recording purposes. |
Exactly. _________________ Regards.
D. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
jmchiro1
Joined: 03 Oct 2011 Posts: 15
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
I use Logic Pro. I am also surprised to see so many users of the internal sequencer While it is nice to have the Kronos' sequencer for a sketch pad or catching a quick idea, it lacks the incredible flexiblity of the DAW, not to mention the bigger screen [mine is 42"]. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Lou Platinum Member
Joined: 06 Sep 2002 Posts: 1305 Location: DE. USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Great thread!
I use Live and Logic, but totally blown away at how many users are using the Kronos sequencer!
Not that it's bad thing, but even more reason for some advanced functionality. Jmo.. _________________ Lou |
|
Back to top |
|
|
BasariStudios Approved Merchant
Joined: 29 May 2005 Posts: 6510 Location: NYC, USA
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Well Jim, of course, nothing can beat a DAW...i don't think anytime soon. _________________ http://www.basaristudios.com
Cubase 8.5 Pro. Windows 7 X64. ASUS SaberTooth X99. Intel I7 5820K. ASUS GTX 960 Strix OC 2GB. 4x8 GB G.SKILL.
2 850 PRO 256GB SSDs. 1 850 EVO 1TB SSD. Acustica: Nebula Server 3 Ultimate, Murano, Magenta 3, Navy, Titanium. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Vim Senior Member
Joined: 08 Mar 2002 Posts: 299 Location: Melbourne Australia
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
I normally use the onboard Seq as a sketch pad (M1>01/W fd >X3>Trinity Plus>Triton. when the idea is about 75% towards where i want it to go i save as smf then load up either in Logic 5.5.1 n a PC (yes it wtill works fine) / SONAR or Cubase depending on what i have 'loaded' or what software instruments i think will help the 'production.' _________________ V Narayan
Australia
ex Fiji
ex Marshall Islands |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SV1200
Joined: 17 Nov 2008 Posts: 20
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 2:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Chriskk wrote: | jimknopf wrote: | I was surprised seing the results of this poll: I thought everyone is using software sequencers these days for any serious sequencing. |
It's not surprising because many people who hang out at music forums are amateurs or weekend warriors. They don't do serious sequencing. |
Kinda sad you guys think this, do you know how much "serious" music was created with hardware sequencers including mpc's, triton, motifs, old Ensoniqs, etc... Even today?
I know a lot of professionals who just dont like sequencing software, emotion of what there creating comes out much easier without a mouse. Moving notes around all day seems so uncreative to me too. Software def has benefits, but to undermine hardware sequencers as serious, is such BS |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Yuma Platinum Member
Joined: 13 Jul 2011 Posts: 659 Location: The Netherlands
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 3:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Both software and hardware sequencers have their pro's and cons.
I don't think you can generalise and say that software sequencers are for the noobs and hardware sequencers for the pro's.
It will mainly be a matter of personal taste, work flow, goal of the musical project and the capabilities of the used hardware or software product. _________________ || My music ■■ How to embed Youtube and Soundcloud on this forum ||
|| Korg Kronos 61 (with upgrade kit) ■■ Korg PadKontrol ■■ Cubase 5 || |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Saxifraga Guest
Joined: 26 Mar 2012 Posts: 520 Location: Berlin, Germany
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
jimknopf wrote: | BasariStudios wrote: | jimknopf wrote: | that's just wishful thinking, not realistic before 2 or 3 workstation generations ahead. |
Not really, its in the Krome already, piano roll, you can draw and stretch
lines in the Editor...e tc. |
Nedim, that's nice, but even with piano roll etc. software sequencers are specialized packets with tons of usful functionality not available on hardware sequencers - and the latter will need 2-3 more hardware generations to be at least principally able to catch up.
Both serve different purposes so far IMHO and will not be comparable for quite a while to come. Everyone should be aware of that, to get rid of completely unrealistic expectations.
But that's a vote FOR piano roll view and easier editing in the Kronos, not against, because it's useful and needed even for the limited onboard recording purposes. |
Let´s see: Combine a iPad 3 (700,-€) with an iRig (45,-€), Macmini (1000,-€ with 8GB and SSD and touchpad), a M-Audio Keyboard (Venom 200,-€ or Prokeys 88 500,-€) plus Novation Ultranova (600,-€) and put everything into one nice box and call it a workstation. Build an app that will control a DAW-Server process inside the Macmini with a sampler and n+1 engines. Voila! Your new workstation is ready.
A rather crude solution could be to have VNC running and use Logic Pro for starters.
3000,-€ (End user price! How much lower would be the cost if you are an enterprise buying higher numbers!?) and you have a formidable system with a big nice multitouch screen.
In the end it comes down to software integration not hardware. The Kronos would easily be able to house a much better UI and Sequencer if Korg would start their software from scratch (not the soundengines). If Korg wants to exist for longer then 5..10 years from now on they will have to do it or they will be obsolete. How long can you sell basically the same product since Trinity? 10 to 20 years? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
midinut Full Member
Joined: 25 Jul 2006 Posts: 243 Location: North Carolina
|
Posted: Mon Sep 17, 2012 5:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I use Cubase 5. I'm planning to upgrade to 6 soon, but my current PC won't handle it (Win XP - 32 bit). I, like many here, am patiently awaiting the new editor so I can integrate my Kronos into Cubase and use it like a VST. I've got a Motif ES6 which I do like the pattern sequencer from, and I still have my M3-73 which I never did use the sequencer in.
My personal workflow is better served with a software DAW than hardware. YMMV. I feel like the DAW provides more of a "traditional recording studio" environment for me more than hardware would or can at this time. If I need a compressor, I've got many to choose from. Same with reverbs, choruses, etc. Not to mention the veritible smorgasboard of VST instruments I have at my disposal. If I can hear it in my head, I can get it recorded pretty much. I can choose linear recording or chop it up into Intro-Verse-Chorus-Verse-Chorus-Bridge-Chorus-Outro all day long. It gives me flexibility that I just can't find in hardware (yet). So in the meantime, I'll continue creating using the tools I have. I got my Kronos mostly for the sounds, engines, KARMA, and ability to stream samples if I need to fly something in. If I were to take my music "live" I might be inclined to try to port my Cubase recordings into the Kronos Sequencer just to recreate it live without taking a PC out with me. But until that time comes, I'm perfectly happy with my recording process. I also use a Zoom R24 as my audio interface. It doubles for me that if I have an idea and don't want to take the time to set up a new Cubase file and record, I can just arm the tracks on the R24 and ... there you go ... idea recorded. _________________ Korg Kronos 88 ::: Korg M3-73 ::: Yamaha MOXF6 ::: MacBook Pro w/ Cubase 7.5, Logic X & Mainstage + way too many VSTs
Line 6 Variax ::: Line 6 POD X3 Live! ::: Martin Acoustic/Electric ::: Mandolin
www.reverbnation.com/bradmize ::: www.cdbaby.com/bradmize |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|