Korg Forums Forum Index Korg Forums
A forum for Korg product users and musicians around the world.
Moderated Independently.
Owned by Irish Acts Recording Studio & hosted by KORG USA
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Jupiter80 vs Kronos
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 48, 49, 50 ... 67, 68, 69  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Phabius
Full Member


Joined: 28 May 2011
Posts: 193
Location: Sao Paulo, Brazil

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 12:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I've spent a good time with the Jupiter. Ok, supernatural is very cool. But in my opinion, that's it. That's why I have a Kronos. It's just a matter of "bang for the buck", easy.

And something I can say right now about the Jupiter (?) is:

Where are my knobs and sliders???
_________________
Korg MS-20 Kit, Korg MS-20 mini, Korg KingKorg, Korg Volca Series (Beats, Bass, Keys), Korg Kronos 61, Korg X50, Korg Triton Extreme 76 (96MB RAM, MOSS), Korg MS2000B, Korg monotron series (classic, duo, delay), Korg monotribe, Kawai K5000W, Nord Stage 88, Nord Electro 2, Nord Modular G2X, Nord Lead 3, Novation X-Station, iPad 3, iPad 4, iPad Air

www.removesilence.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
sparkie
Platinum Member


Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 743
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 4:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

JPWC wrote:
Interesting, the JP80 has SuperNatural Modelling employed for Synth sounds. (And a lot of them per the voice list)

That's right, not only does the thing model a triangle wave, you get the nuance of the filter distortions and phase shifts, and just like real analog, tuning shifts around based on modeled temperature fluctuations.

And it adds various noise, buzzes and clicks, and the coolest feature would have to be that it sounds a little different every time you turn it on and no two JP-80's sound the same (at least not at the same time).
Got to get me one of these! Shocked


Huh? Gawd, Does anyone understand what he is saying??

"no two JP-80's sound the same (at least not at the same time)." Confused
Will someone explain to him the Jupiter 80 isnt an analog synth from the 70s..
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cello
Platinum Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 2152
Location: Glasgow, UK

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 7:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

sparkie wrote:
JPWC wrote:
Interesting, the JP80 has SuperNatural Modelling employed for Synth sounds. (And a lot of them per the voice list)

That's right, not only does the thing model a triangle wave, you get the nuance of the filter distortions and phase shifts, and just like real analog, tuning shifts around based on modeled temperature fluctuations.

And it adds various noise, buzzes and clicks, and the coolest feature would have to be that it sounds a little different every time you turn it on and no two JP-80's sound the same (at least not at the same time).
Got to get me one of these! Shocked


Huh? Gawd, Does anyone understand what he is saying??

"no two JP-80's sound the same (at least not at the same time)." Confused
Will someone explain to him the Jupiter 80 isnt an analog synth from the 70s..


I think what he means is that if you have 2 JP-80s using the same registration/liveset/tone, they will sound different because of the different ways they will be played, thanks to SuperNatural.
_________________
Plugged in: Fantom 8, Jupiter-X, Jupiter 80, System-8, JD-XA, V-Synth GTv2, FA-06, SE-02, JU-06A, TR-09, VT-4, Go:Livecast, Rubix44, Shure SM7b, Push2, Ableton 11 Suite, Sibelius, KRK Rokit 5,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
sparkie
Platinum Member


Joined: 15 Feb 2005
Posts: 743
Location: Indiana

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Oh OK.. But thats what Supernatural is supposed to do.. not sound like some standard common tone without a variance? Also if you save what you have as a registration wont it be the same next time you select it?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JPWC
Platinum Member


Joined: 29 Oct 2010
Posts: 638
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 5:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

"Also if you save what you have as a registration wont it be the same next time you select it?"

No way dude, that why they call it SuperNatural, just like my old analog synths, not only the tuning but the timbre changes also, every time you cycle the power, let alone just letting it sit there and slowly change.

Of course this is all make believe, how could it be real, if it were real it would not be SuperNatural.

Feel free to ignor as I don' have a JP-80 (yet!) Crying or Very sad

Sorry if my intent did not come across, I am make fun of calling synth sounds superNatural. Most of the behaviors of analog synths that we lost in the digital world where unwanted, why would we model these behaviors? The artifacts of a filter of course are desirable, but SuperNatural is supposed to make a more "true" emulation of the original device, so if it is a synth, it's got to go out of tune and be somewhat unstable, to be super"Natural".
_________________
Kronos-6, Krome, M3, Radias, KingKorg, microKorg, KP-2, KP-3, KO-1, KO-1 PRO, Karma, microX, monotron, monotribe, PadCONTROL, Wavedrum Mini, Volca Keys, Beats, Bass, Sample, monotron Duo & Delay, microArranger, M1, Wavestation, Volca Sample, Keys, Beats & Bass, MS-20

JD-XA, JD-Xi, Aira (system 1, TB3, TR8, MX-1), Prophet 12, Mopho X4, Jupiter-80, FA-06, D50, CS1x, CZ101, DX200, AN200, analogFOUR, MachineDrum, MonoMachine, Motif XF6, Virus Snow, Nord Lead 2X, OP-1, MFOS, Tenori-on, QY100, QY70, meeblip se, miniBrute, microBrute, Bass Station 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
djcactus
Senior Member


Joined: 03 Dec 2011
Posts: 375

PostPosted: Sat Dec 17, 2011 10:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JPWC wrote:


Most of the behaviors of analog synths that we lost in the digital world where unwanted, why would we model these behaviors? The artifacts of a filter of course are desirable, but SuperNatural is supposed to make a more "true" emulation of the original device, so if it is a synth, it's got to go out of tune and be somewhat unstable, to be super"Natural".


The reason why we stepped into a digital domain was a necessary move to make polyphonic synths that were not just paraphonic synthesis(not the same). To make a true polyphonic analog synth we need for every key to have its own oscillator, its own envelopes, well essentially its own everything. At this point the cost of this analog electronic device has boomed exponentially. Not only have we made one of our favorite things more expensive, weve also made it more unreliable, with all of those components compared to your monophonic one set of electronics per signal path, if something fails and you need maintenance your in for an expensive fix.

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/jan01/articles/synthsec.asp for some lite reading.

http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/allsynthsecrets.htm for heavy reading

sorry about the major off topic
_________________
2xds-10, ds10+, m01
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Rocness
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 18, 2011 9:51 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JPWC wrote:
"
Sorry if my intent did not come across, I am make fun of calling synth sounds superNatural. Most of the behaviors of analog synths that we lost in the digital world where unwanted, why would we model these behaviors? The artifacts of a filter of course are desirable, but SuperNatural is supposed to make a more "true" emulation of the original device, so if it is a synth, it's got to go out of tune and be somewhat unstable, to be super"Natural".
I think Super Natural is what Roland say's it is, just like Karma is what Stephen K say's it is because they created it .
Back to top
baboon
Junior Member


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 5:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Do i need the jp-80 for pads if i have Omnispere?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dany
Senior Member


Joined: 10 Oct 2008
Posts: 352

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baboon wrote:
Do i need the jp-80 for pads if i have Omnispere?

No.

-
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
RonF
Platinum Member


Joined: 04 Jul 2002
Posts: 1179
Location: San Diego, CA USA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baboon wrote:
Do i need the jp-80 for pads if i have Omnispere?


The JP80 is a particularly great "pad synth". Its very different than Omnisphere. What you *need* is up to you.
_________________
http://soundcloud.com/ronf-3/sets/ronf-music
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCr1zAKpV_F226LQZrUYGPQA
Favorite Gear: Kronos 61, M3, Z1, Radias, KPro, KP3, Moog Voyager, Foogers, Virus TI, Jupiter 80, Integra7, GAIA, SPD-30, Kiwi 106, RE-201, MC808, RC505, MV8800, DSI P6 and OB6 and P12, Ensoniq SQ80, EMU MP-7, Eventide H7600, Eclipse, SPACE, Pitchfactor, Timefactor, Looperlative LP-1, Axe FX Ultra, Nord Modular, DSI Tetra, Tempest, PEK, JDXA, Eurorack Modular, Octatrack, MDUW, Monomachine, A4, RYTM, Waldorf Q Phoenix, MWXTk, Blofeld, TR8.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
baboon
Junior Member


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

RonF wrote:
baboon wrote:
Do i need the jp-80 for pads if i have Omnispere?


The JP80 is a particularly great "pad synth". Its very different than Omnisphere. What you *need* is up to you.

Different?A lot came from roland itselfs on the omnisphere?And the sounds are beautiful.But i hear nothing of the pads of the JP only the acoustic sounds on the web.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cello
Platinum Member


Joined: 11 Jun 2009
Posts: 2152
Location: Glasgow, UK

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:36 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baboon wrote:
RonF wrote:
baboon wrote:
Do i need the jp-80 for pads if i have Omnispere?


The JP80 is a particularly great "pad synth". Its very different than Omnisphere. What you *need* is up to you.

Different?A lot came from roland itselfs on the omnisphere?And the sounds are beautiful.But i hear nothing of the pads of the JP only the acoustic sounds on the web.


The pads are there on the JP-80 and they are excellent; and perhaps more importantly, very easy to create yourself thus having your own unique pads Smile

And of course the JP-80 does so much more than just pads - the acoustics and synths are another huge strength.

But like RonF said - no-one can tell you what you need for your music; only you can determine that - have you tried a JP-80? If not, I recommend that is your next step - but wait until v2.0 is out (on 16th April).

(You might want to allow yourself a few hours though - they will disappear before you know it!)

_________________
Plugged in: Fantom 8, Jupiter-X, Jupiter 80, System-8, JD-XA, V-Synth GTv2, FA-06, SE-02, JU-06A, TR-09, VT-4, Go:Livecast, Rubix44, Shure SM7b, Push2, Ableton 11 Suite, Sibelius, KRK Rokit 5,
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
baboon
Junior Member


Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 81

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I like the pads of the JD-800-990 a lot;perhaps they are on the JP-80 as well?
I like ambient music.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JPWC
Platinum Member


Joined: 29 Oct 2010
Posts: 638
Location: Bay Area, CA

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

have had my JP-80 for about a month now, This is a great keyboard! It's sounds great, and plays great, I simply love it. It compliments the Kronos very well. It is extremely easy to edit and make splits/layer, pad sounds are not a problem.


As I said in other post, I not really sure what "Super Natural" means, But this is definetly one super keyboard, and I say that in the most natural way.

And of special note, it does not go out of tune like my old analog synth Shocked Rolling Eyes
_________________
Kronos-6, Krome, M3, Radias, KingKorg, microKorg, KP-2, KP-3, KO-1, KO-1 PRO, Karma, microX, monotron, monotribe, PadCONTROL, Wavedrum Mini, Volca Keys, Beats, Bass, Sample, monotron Duo & Delay, microArranger, M1, Wavestation, Volca Sample, Keys, Beats & Bass, MS-20

JD-XA, JD-Xi, Aira (system 1, TB3, TR8, MX-1), Prophet 12, Mopho X4, Jupiter-80, FA-06, D50, CS1x, CZ101, DX200, AN200, analogFOUR, MachineDrum, MonoMachine, Motif XF6, Virus Snow, Nord Lead 2X, OP-1, MFOS, Tenori-on, QY100, QY70, meeblip se, miniBrute, microBrute, Bass Station 2
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bruce Lychee
Platinum Member


Joined: 16 Jun 2011
Posts: 856

PostPosted: Wed Apr 11, 2012 8:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

baboon wrote:
Do i need the jp-80 for pads if i have Omnispere?


The JP-80 is a great pad synth. You should check out the review at Great Synthesizers, which also has several audio files of the JP80 pads with the new filters.

http://greatsynthesizers.com/en/test/roland-jupiter-80-metamorphosis-of-a-legend/
_________________
Shigeru Kawai SK5
Roland Jupiter 80
Vintage Vibe 64
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Korg Forums Forum Index -> Korg Kronos All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3 ... 48, 49, 50 ... 67, 68, 69  Next
Page 49 of 69

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group